PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GPS vs. WMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GPSWMT
YTD Return6.31%61.81%
1Y Return64.91%54.06%
3Y Return (Ann)0.05%21.48%
5Y Return (Ann)9.89%17.73%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.17%14.12%
Sharpe Ratio1.582.98
Sortino Ratio2.943.90
Omega Ratio1.321.61
Calmar Ratio1.495.20
Martin Ratio5.5715.62
Ulcer Index17.08%3.60%
Daily Std Dev60.32%18.84%
Max Drawdown-96.84%-77.42%
Current Drawdown-32.28%-0.73%

Fundamentals


GPSWMT
Market Cap$9.21B$676.90B
EPS$1.80$1.92
PE Ratio13.6443.86
PEG Ratio0.653.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.41B$504.23B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.65B$124.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.13B$31.49B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GPS and WMT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GPS vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GPS achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 61.81% return. Over the past 10 years, GPS has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of -2.17%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.49%
39.79%
GPS
WMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GPS vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPS, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPS, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GPS, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPS, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GPS, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.54
WMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WMT, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WMT, currently valued at 3.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WMT, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WMT, currently valued at 5.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WMT, currently valued at 15.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.62

GPS vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPS and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.10
2.98
GPS
WMT

Dividends

GPS vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

GPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than WMT's 0.97% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GPS
The Gap, Inc.
2.77%2.87%5.05%2.73%2.40%5.49%3.72%2.03%5.12%3.68%2.04%1.28%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.97%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%2.24%2.39%

Drawdowns

GPS vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPS drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPS and WMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-32.28%
-0.73%
GPS
WMT

Volatility

GPS vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) is 0.74%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that GPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.74%
3.93%
GPS
WMT

Financials

GPS vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gap, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items