PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GPS vs. ANF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GPS and ANF is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

GPS vs. ANF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gap, Inc. (GPS) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.76%
-16.88%
GPS
ANF

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GPS:

$9.21B

ANF:

$5.78B

EPS

GPS:

$1.80

ANF:

$10.03

PE Ratio

GPS:

13.64

ANF:

11.45

PEG Ratio

GPS:

0.65

ANF:

-24.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPS:

$7.11B

ANF:

$3.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPS:

$2.98B

ANF:

$2.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPS:

$796.00M

ANF:

$388.81M

Returns By Period


GPS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ANF

YTD

-23.20%

1M

-27.76%

6M

-16.88%

1Y

7.84%

5Y*

47.19%

10Y*

18.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GPS vs. ANF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPS is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPS is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPS is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPS is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPS is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPS is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ANF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANF is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANF is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANF is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANF is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANF is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANF is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GPS vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPS, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.300.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPS, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.920.60
The chart of Omega ratio for GPS, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.121.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPS, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.340.19
The chart of Martin ratio for GPS, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.000.660.38
GPS
ANF


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.30
0.13
GPS
ANF

Dividends

GPS vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison

Neither GPS nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GPS
The Gap, Inc.
2.08%2.77%2.87%5.05%2.73%2.40%5.49%3.72%2.03%5.12%3.68%2.04%
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.98%4.63%3.99%4.59%6.67%2.96%2.79%

Drawdowns

GPS vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-32.28%
-40.31%
GPS
ANF

Volatility

GPS vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) is 0.00%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 20.08%. This indicates that GPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
20.08%
GPS
ANF

Financials

GPS vs. ANF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gap, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab