GPS vs. ANF
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gap, Inc. (GPS) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPS or ANF.
Key characteristics
| GPS | ANF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.31% | 60.66% |
| 1Y Return | 61.44% | 106.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.05% | 46.00% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.61% | 51.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.17% | 20.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.58 | 2.04 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.94 | 2.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.49 | 3.49 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.57 | 7.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 17.08% | 15.76% |
| Daily Std Dev | 60.32% | 55.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -96.84% | -86.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -32.28% | -26.31% |
Fundamentals
| GPS | ANF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.21B | $7.15B |
| EPS | $1.80 | $9.43 |
| PE Ratio | 13.64 | 14.84 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.65 | -24.52 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $11.41B | $3.61B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.65B | $2.29B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.13B | $663.14M |
Correlation
The correlation between GPS and ANF is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GPS vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GPS achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than ANF's 60.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GPS has underperformed ANF with an annualized return of -2.17%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively higher 20.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPS vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPS vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
GPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPS The Gap, Inc. | 2.77% | 2.87% | 5.05% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 5.49% | 3.72% | 2.03% | 5.12% | 3.68% | 2.04% | 1.28% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
GPS vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPS drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than ANF's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPS and ANF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPS vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Gap, Inc. (GPS) is 0.00%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that GPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GPS vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gap, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities