GPOR vs. RRC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC).

Performance

GPOR vs. RRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPOR vs. RRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GPOR Gulfport Energy Corporation	1.72%	12.92%	38.29%	80.88%	2.24%	5.91%
RRC Range Resources Corporation	28.43%	-1.05%	19.35%	23.05%	41.10%	27.08%

Fundamentals

EPS GPOR : $21.75 RRC : $2.40
PE Ratio GPOR : 9.73 RRC : 18.85
PEG Ratio GPOR : 0.10 RRC : 0.31
PS Ratio GPOR : 2.54 RRC : 3.77
Total Revenue (TTM) GPOR : $1.52B RRC : $2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) GPOR : $1.31B RRC : $985.82M
EBITDA (TTM) GPOR : $870.09M RRC : $1.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPOR achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than RRC's 28.43% return.

GPOR

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 16.90%
• 1Y: 14.90%
• 3Y*: 38.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RRC

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 28.43%
• 6M: 20.61%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 33.53%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GPOR vs. RRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPOR

GPOR Risk / Return Rank: 54
GPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 56

RRC

RRC Risk / Return Rank: 53
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPOR vs. RRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPOR	RRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.39	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	0.73	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	0.68	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	1.16	+0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPOR vs. RRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the RRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPOR and RRC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPOR	RRC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.39	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.17	+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between GPOR and RRC is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GPOR vs. RRC - Dividend Comparison

GPOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPOR Gulfport Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RRC Range Resources Corporation	0.82%	1.02%	0.89%	1.05%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.84%	0.47%	0.23%	0.65%

Drawdowns

GPOR vs. RRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPOR drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum RRC drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPOR and RRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPOR	RRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-97.86%	+54.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.77%	-24.15%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-48.28%	+43.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-46.57%	+36.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.23%	14.09%	-2.86%

Volatility

GPOR vs. RRC - Volatility Comparison

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Range Resources Corporation (RRC) at 8.58%. This indicates that GPOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPOR	RRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	8.58%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.86%	25.20%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.36%	37.01%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.63%	46.94%	-7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.63%	56.88%	-17.25%

Financials