PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPOR vs. PSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPOR vs. PSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Public Storage (PSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPOR achieves a -18.83% return, which is significantly lower than PSA's 17.55% return.


GPOR

1D
0.86%
1M
-13.32%
YTD
-18.83%
6M
-22.44%
1Y
-14.28%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*

PSA

1D
0.95%
1M
2.24%
YTD
17.55%
6M
10.84%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
5.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPOR vs. PSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
-18.83%12.92%38.29%80.88%2.24%5.91%
PSA
Public Storage
17.55%-9.69%2.09%13.60%-20.20%38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GPOR and PSA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.10

The correlation between GPOR and PSA shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GPOR:

$3.16B

PSA:

$53.12B

EPS

GPOR:

$31.99

PSA:

$10.84

PE Ratio

GPOR:

5.28

PSA:

27.87

PEG Ratio

GPOR:

0.05

PSA:

1.68

PS Ratio

GPOR:

2.21

PSA:

10.93

PB Ratio

GPOR:

1.75

PSA:

5.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPOR:

$1.42B

PSA:

$4.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPOR:

$677.45M

PSA:

$2.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPOR:

$1.12B

PSA:

$3.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPOR vs. PSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPOR
GPOR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PSA
PSA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPOR vs. PSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Public Storage (PSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPORPSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

0.17

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

0.40

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.05

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

0.23

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.12

0.50

-1.62

GPOR vs. PSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the PSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPOR and PSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPORPSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

0.17

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.23

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.41

+0.09

Drawdowns

GPOR vs. PSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPOR drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum PSA drawdown of -60.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPOR and PSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPORPSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-60.19%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.77%

-16.20%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-25.62%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.22%

-37.93%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.12%

-12.84%

-11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-15.78%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.80%

7.52%

+5.28%

Volatility

GPOR vs. PSA - Volatility Comparison

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Public Storage (PSA) at 7.28%. This indicates that GPOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPORPSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

7.28%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.06%

17.64%

+7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.46%

22.59%

+11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.40%

23.81%

+15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.34%

23.45%

+15.89%

Dividends

GPOR vs. PSA - Dividend Comparison

GPOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSA
Public Storage
3.97%4.62%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%

Financials

GPOR vs. PSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gulfport Energy Corporation and Public Storage. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
437.53M
1.22B
(GPOR) Total Revenue
(PSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GPOR vs. PSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gulfport Energy Corporation and Public Storage over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
72.1%
Portfolio components
GPOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gulfport Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 437.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 877.80M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

GPOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gulfport Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 227.59M and revenue of 437.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.0%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 474.28M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

GPOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gulfport Energy Corporation reported a net income of 165.82M and revenue of 437.53M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 529.38M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPOR and PSA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPOR has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to PSA (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPOR dropped -43.22% vs PSA's -60.19%.

PSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPOR and PSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer