PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPK vs. SLGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPK vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPK achieves a -31.33% return, which is significantly lower than SLGN's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GPK has underperformed SLGN with an annualized return of -0.08%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.81% annualized return.


GPK

1D
-5.51%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-31.33%
6M
-32.50%
1Y
-50.47%
3Y*
-22.92%
5Y*
-8.82%
10Y*
-0.08%

SLGN

1D
-0.43%
1M
10.01%
YTD
3.82%
6M
2.30%
1Y
-21.57%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPK vs. SLGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
-31.33%-43.33%11.73%12.65%15.87%16.97%3.93%59.84%-29.60%28.07%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
3.82%-21.11%16.80%-11.33%22.68%17.06%21.06%33.55%-18.44%16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GPK and SLGN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 1997

0.34

The correlation between GPK and SLGN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GPK:

$3.00B

SLGN:

$4.39B

EPS

GPK:

$0.92

SLGN:

$2.66

PE Ratio

GPK:

11.01

SLGN:

15.57

PS Ratio

GPK:

0.35

SLGN:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPK:

$8.65B

SLGN:

$6.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPK:

$1.16B

SLGN:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPK:

$1.01B

SLGN:

$842.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPK vs. SLGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPK
GPK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
GPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPK Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SLGN
SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPK vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPKSLGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.89

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.62

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-0.88

-0.43

GPK vs. SLGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPK Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the SLGN Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPK and SLGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPK vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPK drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than SLGN's maximum drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPK and SLGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPKSLGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-86.14%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.23%

-34.87%

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.71%

-35.03%

-34.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.71%

-35.03%

-34.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.71%

-35.03%

-34.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.23%

-25.65%

-39.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.13%

-16.64%

-40.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.35%

24.47%

+13.88%

Volatility

GPK vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison

Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) at 7.45%. This indicates that GPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPKSLGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.18%

7.45%

+6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.68%

20.89%

+15.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.25%

32.55%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.23%

25.74%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.55%

23.91%

+5.64%

Dividends

GPK vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison

GPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than SLGN's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
4.35%2.92%1.47%1.62%1.46%1.54%1.77%1.80%2.82%2.91%1.80%1.56%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
1.98%1.98%1.46%1.59%1.23%1.31%1.29%1.42%1.69%1.22%1.33%1.19%

Financials

GPK vs. SLGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and Silgan Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20222023202420252026
2.16B
1.56B
(GPK) Total Revenue
(SLGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GPK vs. SLGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and Silgan Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%202220232024202520260
17.0%
Portfolio components
GPK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.80M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

GPK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 134.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

GPK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of -43.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPK and SLGN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPK has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SLGN (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPK dropped -98.11% vs SLGN's -86.14%.

SLGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPK and SLGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer