GPK vs. RS
GPK (Graphic Packaging Holding Company) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. GPK operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while RS operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, GPK returned -0.08%/yr vs 20.79%/yr for RS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPK vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPK achieves a -31.33% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 40.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GPK has underperformed RS with an annualized return of -0.08%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.79% annualized return.
GPK
- 1D
- -5.51%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -31.33%
- 6M
- -32.50%
- 1Y
- -50.47%
- 3Y*
- -22.92%
- 5Y*
- -8.82%
- 10Y*
- -0.08%
RS
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 40.72%
- 6M
- 37.56%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.79%
GPK vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company | -31.33% | -43.33% | 11.73% | 12.65% | 15.87% | 16.97% | 3.93% | 59.84% | -29.60% | 28.07% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 40.72% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPK and RS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1994 | 0.33 |
The correlation between GPK and RS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPK:
$0.92
RS:
$14.01
GPK:
11.01
RS:
28.80
GPK:
0.35
RS:
1.49
GPK:
$8.65B
RS:
$14.29B
GPK:
$1.16B
RS:
$3.90B
GPK:
$1.01B
RS:
$1.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPK vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
GPK
RS
GPK vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPK | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.25 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.50 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 2.59 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPK vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPK drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than RS's maximum drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPK and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPK | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.11% | -83.80% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.23% | -22.30% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.71% | -22.30% | -47.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.71% | -22.32% | -47.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.71% | -40.83% | -28.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.23% | -2.40% | -62.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -16.47% | -40.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.35% | 12.90% | +25.45% |
Volatility
GPK vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 7.26%. This indicates that GPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPK | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 7.26% | +6.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.68% | 17.43% | +19.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.25% | 25.70% | +17.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 27.87% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 29.69% | -0.14% |
Dividends
GPK vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
GPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than RS's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company | 4.35% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.82% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.56% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
GPK vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPK vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
GPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
GPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
GPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of -43.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPK and RS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPK has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to RS (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPK dropped -98.11% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPK and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer