GPK vs. RS
Compare and contrast key facts about Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPK or RS.
Correlation
The correlation between GPK and RS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
GPK vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GPK:
-0.47
RS:
0.16
GPK:
-0.44
RS:
0.47
GPK:
0.94
RS:
1.05
GPK:
-0.47
RS:
0.21
GPK:
-1.49
RS:
0.49
GPK:
9.27%
RS:
9.46%
GPK:
29.33%
RS:
28.20%
GPK:
-96.61%
RS:
-83.80%
GPK:
-26.92%
RS:
-11.92%
Fundamentals
GPK:
$6.58B
RS:
$15.35B
GPK:
$2.04
RS:
$14.07
GPK:
10.69
RS:
20.63
GPK:
1.13
RS:
1.20
GPK:
0.88
RS:
1.11
GPK:
2.57
RS:
2.15
GPK:
$8.67B
RS:
$13.67B
GPK:
$1.88B
RS:
$3.88B
GPK:
$1.60B
RS:
$1.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPK achieves a -18.21% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 10.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GPK has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 6.16%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.66% annualized return.
GPK
-18.21%
-12.01%
-19.82%
-17.14%
13.91%
6.16%
RS
10.01%
11.40%
2.84%
3.36%
30.15%
18.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPK vs. RS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GPK
RS
GPK vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPK vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
GPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than RS's 1.53% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company | 1.85% | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.82% | 2.43% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
GPK vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPK drawdown since its inception was -96.61%, which is greater than RS's maximum drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPK and RS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPK vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a higher volatility of 19.67% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 9.42%. This indicates that GPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GPK vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPK vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
GPK - Gross Margin
RS - Gross Margin
GPK - Operating Margin
RS - Operating Margin
GPK - Net Margin
RS - Net Margin
Competitive Comparison
See how gross margin, operating margin, and net margin compare for the largest companies in the Packaging & Containers industry.
Symbol | Name | Market Cap | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | Net Margin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPL.NS | EPL Limited | 60.82B | 60.3% | 11.4% | 9.2% |
IP | International Paper Company | 24.20B | 27.8% | 18.8% | -1.8% |
INP.DE | International Paper Company | 21.42B | 29.0% | -1.6% | -3.2% |
AMCR | Amcor plc | 21.36B | 19.6% | 9.4% | 5.9% |
PKG | Packaging Corporation of America | 16.30B | — | — | — |
BALL | Ball Corporation | 14.59B | 20.5% | 10.8% | -1.1% |
WRK | WestRock Company | 13.30B | — | — | — |
CCL-B.TO | CCL Industries Inc | 12.53B | 28.7% | 13.8% | 9.9% |
CCL-A.TO | CCL Industries Inc. | 12.51B | 28.7% | 13.8% | 9.9% |
CCK | Crown Holdings, Inc. | 11.34B | 17.8% | 12.6% | 6.7% |
GPK vs. RS - Valuation Comparison
GPK - PE Ratio
RS - PE Ratio
GPK - PEG Ratio
RS - PEG Ratio
GPK - PS Ratio
RS - PS Ratio
GPK - PB Ratio
RS - PB Ratio
User Portfolios with GPK or RS
Recent discussions
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG
Drawdowns and Data
Hi what data sources do you guys use for different ETF, and Mutual Data? Also are drawdowns calculated daily or monthly?
Thank You
Bee Zee
Discrepancy between SPY and ^GSPC?
Hello, from the charts, SPY seems to be outperforming its benchmark ^GSPC. That looks strange. From my understanding, SPY is designed to closely track the S&P 500.
Could there be an error in the charts?
Hedge Cat