GPK vs. PPG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG).

Performance

GPK vs. PPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPK vs. PPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company	-33.25%	-43.33%	11.73%	12.65%	15.87%	16.97%	3.93%	59.84%	-29.60%	28.07%
PPG PPG Industries, Inc.	4.91%	-11.96%	-18.46%	21.19%	-25.71%	21.28%	10.08%	32.81%	-11.00%	25.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GPK : $2.95B PPG : $24.07B
EPS GPK : $1.49 PPG : $7.01
PE Ratio GPK : 6.69 PPG : 15.25
PEG Ratio GPK : 0.19 PPG : 2.09
PS Ratio GPK : 0.34 PPG : 1.52
Total Revenue (TTM) GPK : $8.62B PPG : $15.88B
Gross Profit (TTM) GPK : $1.31B PPG : $4.96B
EBITDA (TTM) GPK : $1.19B PPG : $2.54B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPK achieves a -33.25% return, which is significantly lower than PPG's 4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GPK has underperformed PPG with an annualized return of -0.58%, while PPG has yielded a comparatively higher 1.28% annualized return.

GPK

• 1D: 5.63%
• 1M: -17.80%
• YTD: -33.25%
• 6M: -48.27%
• 1Y: -60.59%
• 3Y*: -25.48%
• 5Y*: -9.92%
• 10Y*: -0.58%

PPG

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -13.30%
• YTD: 4.91%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 0.32%
• 3Y*: -5.08%
• 5Y*: -4.91%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GPK vs. PPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPK

GPK Risk / Return Rank: 2
GPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GPK Omega Ratio Rank: 1
GPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GPK Martin Ratio Rank: 3

PPG

PPG Risk / Return Rank: 40
PPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PPG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PPG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPK vs. PPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPK	PPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.47	0.01	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.50	0.24	-2.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.67	1.03	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	0.08	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.82	0.20	-2.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPK vs. PPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPK Sharpe Ratio is -1.47, which is lower than the PPG Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPK and PPG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPK	PPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.47	0.01	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	-0.18	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.05	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.38	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between GPK and PPG is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GPK vs. PPG - Dividend Comparison

GPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than PPG's 2.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company	4.43%	2.92%	1.47%	1.62%	1.46%	1.54%	1.77%	1.80%	2.82%	2.91%	1.80%	1.56%
PPG PPG Industries, Inc.	2.63%	2.71%	2.23%	1.70%	1.92%	1.31%	1.46%	1.48%	1.82%	1.46%	1.65%	1.43%

Drawdowns

GPK vs. PPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPK drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than PPG's maximum drawdown of -63.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPK and PPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPK	PPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.11%	-63.02%	-35.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.13%	-25.68%	-39.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.71%	-46.02%	-23.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.71%	-46.02%	-23.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.20%	-35.40%	-30.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.08%	-13.17%	-43.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.49%	10.75%	+22.74%

Volatility

GPK vs. PPG - Volatility Comparison

Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a higher volatility of 13.52% compared to PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) at 11.76%. This indicates that GPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPK	PPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.52%	11.76%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.77%	20.02%	+13.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.30%	31.07%	+10.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.82%	27.21%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.78%	27.12%	+1.66%

Financials

GPK vs. PPG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and PPG Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GPK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PPG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PPG Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GPK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 156.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

PPG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PPG Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

GPK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of 71.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

PPG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PPG Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 311.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.