GPK vs. LW
GPK (Graphic Packaging Holding Company) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. GPK operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, GPK returned -8.82%/yr vs -9.48%/yr for LW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPK vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPK achieves a -31.33% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 6.08% return.
GPK
- 1D
- -5.51%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -31.33%
- 6M
- -32.50%
- 1Y
- -50.47%
- 3Y*
- -22.92%
- 5Y*
- -8.82%
- 10Y*
- -0.08%
LW
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- -15.95%
- 3Y*
- -25.87%
- 5Y*
- -9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GPK vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company | -31.33% | -43.33% | 11.73% | 12.65% | 15.87% | 16.97% | 3.93% | 59.84% | -29.60% | 28.07% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 6.08% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPK and LW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
GPK:
$3.00B
LW:
$6.08B
GPK:
$0.92
LW:
$2.15
GPK:
11.01
LW:
20.30
GPK:
0.30
LW:
0.28
GPK:
0.35
LW:
0.94
GPK:
0.92
LW:
3.33
GPK:
$8.65B
LW:
$6.52B
GPK:
$1.16B
LW:
$1.34B
GPK:
$1.01B
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPK vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
GPK
LW
GPK vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPK | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.97 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.39 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -0.66 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPK vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPK drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPK and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPK | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.11% | -64.56% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.23% | -41.37% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.71% | -64.56% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.71% | -64.56% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.23% | -59.42% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -21.40% | -35.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.35% | 24.31% | +14.04% |
Volatility
GPK vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 8.70%. This indicates that GPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPK | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 8.70% | +5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.68% | 38.51% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.25% | 44.41% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 37.88% | -6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 35.87% | -6.32% |
Dividends
GPK vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
GPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than LW's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company | 4.35% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.82% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.56% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.43% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GPK vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graphic Packaging Holding Company and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPK vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
GPK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
GPK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
GPK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of -43.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPK and LW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPK has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to LW (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPK dropped -98.11% vs LW's -64.56%.
LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPK and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer