PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GPIQ vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GPIQ vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.43%
31.66%
GPIQ
FNGU

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 108.49% return.


GPIQ

YTD

20.61%

1M

1.57%

6M

9.50%

1Y

26.17%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

FNGU

YTD

108.49%

1M

7.13%

6M

34.55%

1Y

146.18%

5Y (annualized)

60.59%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


GPIQFNGU
Sharpe Ratio1.792.06
Sortino Ratio2.412.39
Omega Ratio1.341.32
Calmar Ratio2.252.39
Martin Ratio9.138.50
Ulcer Index2.87%17.29%
Daily Std Dev14.71%71.51%
Max Drawdown-11.66%-92.34%
Current Drawdown-2.02%-13.22%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GPIQ vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for FNGU: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for GPIQ: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between GPIQ and FNGU is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GPIQ vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPIQ, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.792.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPIQ, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.412.39
The chart of Omega ratio for GPIQ, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.341.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPIQ, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.253.19
The chart of Martin ratio for GPIQ, currently valued at 9.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.138.50
GPIQ
FNGU

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.50Wed 30NovemberNov 03Tue 05Thu 07Sat 09Mon 11Wed 13Fri 15Nov 17
1.79
2.06
GPIQ
FNGU

Dividends

GPIQ vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.98%1.74%
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.02%
-13.22%
GPIQ
FNGU

Volatility

GPIQ vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is 4.60%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 20.89%. This indicates that GPIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.60%
20.89%
GPIQ
FNGU