GOOX vs. AMT
GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex, while AMT (American Tower Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, GOOX returned 274.80% vs -11.45% for AMT. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GOOX vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's 4.84% return.
GOOX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 274.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- -11.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
GOOX vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 18.83% | 121.41% | 46.80% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.84% | -0.92% | -8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOX and AMT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOX vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
GOOX
AMT
GOOX vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 0.94 | +0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.10 | -0.43 | +7.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.06 | -0.63 | +24.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83 | -0.50 | +5.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.20 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
GOOX vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and AMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.46% | -98.70% | +46.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.98% | -26.67% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.02% | -30.49% | +9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -27.02% | +9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 18.22% | -6.74% |
Volatility
GOOX vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a higher volatility of 16.21% compared to American Tower Corporation (AMT) at 7.26%. This indicates that GOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOX | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.21% | 7.26% | +8.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.03% | 18.40% | +21.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.42% | 23.21% | +34.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 26.23% | +34.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.37% | 26.12% | +34.25% |
Dividends
GOOX vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than AMT's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.26% | 0.30% | 16.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOX and AMT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOX has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to AMT (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs AMT's -98.70%.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOX and AMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer