PortfoliosLab logo
GOOD vs. MPW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GOOD and MPW is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GOOD vs. MPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GOOD:

0.13

MPW:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

GOOD:

0.48

MPW:

0.22

Omega Ratio

GOOD:

1.06

MPW:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

GOOD:

0.14

MPW:

-0.08

Martin Ratio

GOOD:

0.56

MPW:

-0.30

Ulcer Index

GOOD:

8.60%

MPW:

21.16%

Daily Std Dev

GOOD:

20.76%

MPW:

53.03%

Max Drawdown

GOOD:

-67.22%

MPW:

-84.50%

Current Drawdown

GOOD:

-27.07%

MPW:

-71.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOD:

$665.62M

MPW:

$3.01B

EPS

GOOD:

$0.30

MPW:

-$2.76

PEG Ratio

GOOD:

-62.67

MPW:

1.93

PS Ratio

GOOD:

4.40

MPW:

3.03

PB Ratio

GOOD:

3.56

MPW:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOD:

$151.17M

MPW:

$948.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOD:

$118.59M

MPW:

$312.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOD:

$118.40M

MPW:

$1.69B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a -9.92% return, which is significantly lower than MPW's 30.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed MPW with an annualized return of 6.03%, while MPW has yielded a comparatively lower -2.66% annualized return.


GOOD

YTD

-9.92%

1M

2.37%

6M

-12.18%

1Y

2.62%

5Y*

7.71%

10Y*

6.03%

MPW

YTD

30.08%

1M

-5.94%

6M

21.59%

1Y

7.03%

5Y*

-13.99%

10Y*

-2.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOOD vs. MPW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MPW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPW is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPW is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPW is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPW is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPW is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPW is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GOOD vs. MPW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GOOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the MPW Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOD and MPW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GOOD vs. MPW - Dividend Comparison

GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, which matches MPW's 7.69% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
7.72%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%
MPW
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
7.69%11.65%17.92%10.41%4.74%4.96%4.83%6.22%6.97%7.40%7.65%6.10%

Drawdowns

GOOD vs. MPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, smaller than the maximum MPW drawdown of -84.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and MPW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GOOD vs. MPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is 4.66%, while Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPW) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that GOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GOOD vs. MPW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Medical Properties Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
37.50M
223.80M
(GOOD) Total Revenue
(MPW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOD vs. MPW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Medical Properties Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
77.4%
100.0%
(GOOD) Gross Margin
(MPW) Gross Margin
GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.03M and revenue of 37.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

MPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 223.80M and revenue of 223.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

MPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 181.89M and revenue of 223.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 81.3%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.

MPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Medical Properties Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -99.14M and revenue of 223.80M, resulting in a net margin of -44.3%.