PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. HTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
-0.94%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
-18.99%3.54%33.33%42.91%-10.42%26.50%14.49%39.86%-6.86%1.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has outperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 16.72%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.98% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-27.25%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
19.76%
1Y
98.89%
3Y*
43.60%
5Y*
25.06%
10Y*
16.72%

HTGC

1D
4.01%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-18.99%
6M
-17.22%
1Y
-14.23%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLDXHTGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

-0.56

+2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

-0.62

+3.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.92

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

-0.58

+3.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.71

-1.54

+14.25

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLDXHTGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

-0.56

+2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.36

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.35

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and HTGC is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.72%, more than HTGC's 12.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.72%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%0.00%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
12.73%9.99%9.56%11.40%13.77%9.76%9.02%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and HTGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXHTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-68.21%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.96%

-24.74%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-36.11%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-57.54%

+8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.41%

-23.41%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-10.79%

-23.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.18%

9.38%

-1.20%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 8.67%. This indicates that GOLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXHTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.86%

8.67%

+7.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.05%

19.68%

+15.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.34%

25.56%

+16.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.76%

25.66%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.17%

27.76%

+4.41%