PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD vs. KGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOLD vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 31.00% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return.


GOLD

1D
2.17%
1M
7.64%
YTD
31.00%
6M
40.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KGC

1D
2.90%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
-8.92%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
76.13%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
31.00%13.01%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-8.92%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD and KGC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.55

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLD:

$1.17B

KGC:

$30.80B

EPS

GOLD:

$3.06

KGC:

$2.35

PE Ratio

GOLD:

14.44

KGC:

10.87

PS Ratio

GOLD:

0.05

KGC:

3.92

PB Ratio

GOLD:

1.38

KGC:

3.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLD:

$23.02B

KGC:

$7.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLD:

$169.58M

KGC:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLD:

-$162.41M

KGC:

$5.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLDKGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

GOLD vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLD vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and KGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDKGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-96.00%

+55.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.46%

-32.63%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.05%

-57.60%

+39.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

Volatility

GOLD vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDKGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.55%

51.35%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.55%

44.22%

+14.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.55%

47.01%

+11.54%

Dividends

GOLD vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.57%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Financials

GOLD vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Mining Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.35B
2.37B
(GOLD) Total Revenue
(KGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOLD vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barrick Mining Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
1.7%
57.8%
Portfolio components
GOLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 176.58M and revenue of 10.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.7%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

GOLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 106.13M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

GOLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Mining Corporation reported a net income of 59.49M and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD and KGC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD and KGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer