PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GOF vs. QDTE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GOF and QDTE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

GOF vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
22.53%
22.64%
GOF
QDTE

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GOF:

11.19%

QDTE:

16.93%

Max Drawdown

GOF:

-54.67%

QDTE:

-10.74%

Current Drawdown

GOF:

-0.18%

QDTE:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 5.64% return.


GOF

YTD

4.40%

1M

2.89%

6M

8.10%

1Y

31.31%

5Y*

9.71%

10Y*

9.40%

QDTE

YTD

5.64%

1M

2.79%

6M

14.35%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GOF vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOF has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
Expense ratio chart for GOF: current value at 1.62% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.62%
Expense ratio chart for QDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOF vs. QDTE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOF is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOF is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOF is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOF is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOF is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GOF vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOF, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.69
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOF, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.63
The chart of Omega ratio for GOF, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.50
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOF, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.40
The chart of Martin ratio for GOF, currently valued at 17.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0017.59
GOF
QDTE


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

GOF vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.04%, less than QDTE's 36.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
14.04%14.31%17.06%14.35%11.92%11.26%12.07%11.95%10.12%11.12%12.98%10.45%
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
36.01%32.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GOF vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.67%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and QDTE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.18%
0
GOF
QDTE

Volatility

GOF vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) is 2.76%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that GOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.76%
4.66%
GOF
QDTE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab