PortfoliosLab logo
GOAT vs. QUAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GOAT and QUAL is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GOAT vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
44.62%
124.90%
GOAT
QUAL

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GOAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QUAL

YTD

-3.80%

1M

3.18%

6M

-6.83%

1Y

6.35%

5Y*

14.74%

10Y*

12.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GOAT vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOAT has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOAT vs. QUAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOAT

QUAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QUAL is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QUAL is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QUAL is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QUAL is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QUAL is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QUAL is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GOAT vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.00
0.35
GOAT
QUAL

Dividends

GOAT vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

GOAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GOAT
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
0.00%0.00%1.86%3.64%5.66%2.96%2.35%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%1.35%

Drawdowns

GOAT vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.14%
-8.04%
GOAT
QUAL

Volatility

GOAT vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) is 0.00%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that GOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
6.32%
GOAT
QUAL