PortfoliosLab logo
GOAT vs. IOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GOAT and IOO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GOAT vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
44.62%
136.83%
GOAT
IOO

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GOAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IOO

YTD

-3.25%

1M

4.40%

6M

-3.15%

1Y

8.48%

5Y*

16.21%

10Y*

11.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GOAT vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOAT has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOAT vs. IOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOAT

IOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IOO is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IOO is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IOO is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IOO is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IOO is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IOO is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GOAT vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.00
0.42
GOAT
IOO

Dividends

GOAT vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

GOAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GOAT
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
0.00%0.00%1.86%3.64%5.66%2.96%2.35%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
1.11%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%3.52%

Drawdowns

GOAT vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.14%
-7.25%
GOAT
IOO

Volatility

GOAT vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (GOAT) is 0.00%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that GOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
6.80%
GOAT
IOO