GNW vs. FNGS
GNW (Genworth Financial, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Over the past 5 years, GNW returned 24.10%/yr vs 18.98%/yr for FNGS. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GNW vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GNW having a 8.86% return and FNGS slightly higher at 9.02%.
GNW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.75%
FNGS
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.57M | $1.92M | $2.40M | |
| $28.70M | $27.28M | $26.76M |
GNW vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNW Genworth Financial, Inc. | 8.86% | 29.18% | 4.64% | 26.28% | 30.62% | 7.14% | -14.09% | 9.18% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 9.02% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNW and FNGS is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GNW and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNW vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
GNW
FNGS
GNW vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GNW | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.51 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 1.37 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GNW vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNW drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNW and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNW | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.63% | -48.98% | -48.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.07% | -22.93% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.74% | -26.77% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -48.98% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.28% | -7.74% | -64.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.40% | -10.80% | -56.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 8.61% | -2.82% |
Volatility
GNW vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 5.87%. This indicates that GNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNW | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 5.87% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 18.36% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 22.86% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 30.29% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.53% | 31.07% | +16.46% |
Dividends
GNW vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GNW nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GNW and FNGS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNW has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to FNGS (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNW dropped -97.63% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
GNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNW and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer