GNW vs. FNGS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).

FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.

Performance

GNW vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GNW vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GNW Genworth Financial, Inc.	-9.30%	29.18%	4.64%	26.28%	30.62%	7.14%	-14.09%	10.83%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	-10.61%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNW achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -10.61% return.

GNW

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -9.30%
• 6M: -7.25%
• 1Y: 12.97%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 19.15%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

FNGS

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -3.29%
• YTD: -10.61%
• 6M: -12.74%
• 1Y: 20.77%
• 3Y*: 31.31%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GNW vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNW

GNW Risk / Return Rank: 55
GNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GNW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GNW Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 39
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNW vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GNW	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.77	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	1.32	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	0.96	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	2.94	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GNW vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNW Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNW and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GNW	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.77	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.54	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.91	-0.96

Correlation

The correlation between GNW and FNGS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GNW vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNW nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GNW vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNW drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNW and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GNW	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.63%	-48.98%	-48.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.07%	-22.93%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.59%	-48.98%	+22.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.90%	-17.66%	-59.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.31%	-11.02%	-56.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	7.52%	-0.95%

Volatility

GNW vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) is 6.32%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that GNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GNW	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	8.61%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.27%	15.82%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.48%	27.04%	+5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	29.98%	+4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.24%	31.34%	+17.90%