PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
GNT vs. KALL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GNT vs. KALL

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL).

KALL is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Feb 13, 2015.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GNT or KALL.

Correlation

The correlation between GNT and KALL is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GNT vs. KALL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GNT:

17.30%

KALL:

38.01%

Max Drawdown

GNT:

-0.33%

KALL:

-3.35%

Current Drawdown

GNT:

0.00%

KALL:

-0.67%

Returns By Period

GNT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KALL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GNT vs. KALL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GNT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GNT is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GNT is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GNT is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GNT is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GNT is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GNT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
KALL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KALL is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KALL is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KALL is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KALL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KALL is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KALL is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GNT vs. KALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

GNT vs. KALL - Dividend Comparison

GNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than KALL's 2.15% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GNT
GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust		6.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF		2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GNT vs. KALL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNT drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum KALL drawdown of -3.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNT and KALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

GNT vs. KALL - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...