GNT vs. KALL

In the year-to-date period, GNT achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than KALL's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GNT has outperformed KALL with an annualized return of 6.56%, while KALL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.20% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the KALL Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNT and KALL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than KALL's 2.15% yield.

The maximum GNT drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than KALL's maximum drawdown of -56.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNT and KALL.

GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.