PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNS vs. POWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNS vs. POWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genius Group Ltd (GNS) and AMMO, Inc. (POWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNS achieves a -62.40% return, which is significantly lower than POWW's 31.58% return.


GNS

1D
2.86%
1M
-6.49%
YTD
-62.40%
6M
-66.20%
1Y
-59.54%
3Y*
-68.80%
5Y*
10Y*

POWW

1D
1.81%
1M
9.22%
YTD
31.58%
6M
22.95%
1Y
66.67%
3Y*
0.75%
5Y*
-23.79%
10Y*
46.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNS vs. POWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GNS
Genius Group Ltd
-62.40%-16.74%-89.59%100.70%-97.81%
POWW
AMMO, Inc.
31.58%55.45%-47.62%21.39%-59.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GNS and POWW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.14

Fundamentals

EPS

GNS:

-$0.65

POWW:

-$0.04

PS Ratio

GNS:

2.00

POWW:

5.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

GNS:

$5.75M

POWW:

$51.13M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GNS:

$1.60M

POWW:

$40.97M

EBITDA (TTM)

GNS:

-$22.35M

POWW:

$9.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Genius Group Ltd

AMMO, Inc.

Return for Risk

GNS vs. POWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNS
GNS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNS Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

POWW
POWW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
POWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
POWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNS vs. POWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genius Group Ltd (GNS) and AMMO, Inc. (POWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNSPOWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.24

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

3.03

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

7.88

-8.85

GNS vs. POWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNS Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the POWW Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNS and POWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNS vs. POWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNS drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than POWW's maximum drawdown of -90.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNS and POWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNSPOWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-90.01%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.82%

-22.12%

-64.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.09%

-67.62%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-77.02%

-22.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.26%

-58.53%

-37.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.18%

8.63%

+52.55%

Volatility

GNS vs. POWW - Volatility Comparison

Genius Group Ltd (GNS) has a higher volatility of 29.13% compared to AMMO, Inc. (POWW) at 12.42%. This indicates that GNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNSPOWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.13%

12.42%

+16.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.00%

29.53%

+41.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.04%

48.75%

+86.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.64%

57.41%

+161.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.64%

2,513.95%

-2,295.31%

Dividends

GNS vs. POWW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNS nor POWW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GNS vs. POWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genius Group Ltd and AMMO, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-40.00M-20.00M0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
1.36M
13.89M
(GNS) Total Revenue
(POWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GNS and POWW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNS has higher volatility (29.13%) compared to POWW (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNS dropped -99.93% vs POWW's -90.01%.

POWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNS and POWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer