GNR vs. QYLD
GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GNR returned 10.91%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GNR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
GNR vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 10.91%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.
GNR
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 6M
- 23.12%
- 1Y
- 43.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
GNR vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 20.27% | 28.68% | -8.27% | 2.95% | 10.20% | 24.73% | -0.03% | 16.49% | -13.19% | 22.64% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNR and QYLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between GNR and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GNR vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GNR
QYLD
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
GNR
QYLD
Energy
GNR
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
GNR
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
GNR
QYLD
Real Estate
GNR
QYLD
Industrials
GNR
QYLD
Financial Services
GNR
QYLD
Healthcare
GNR
QYLD
Utilities
GNR
QYLD
Communication Services
GNR
-
QYLD
Technology
GNR
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNR vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GNR
QYLD
GNR vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNR | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.63 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 4.84 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.28 | 28.36 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNR | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.80 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.59 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
GNR vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNR | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -24.75% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -4.97% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -19.06% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -24.61% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.59% | -24.75% | -23.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.06% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -3.84% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 0.85% | +1.18% |
Volatility
GNR vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that GNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNR | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 1.85% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 7.12% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 8.58% | +7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 14.70% | +5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 15.49% | +6.39% |
GNR vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GNR vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.47% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNR and QYLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNR has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNR dropped -51.37% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.91% vs 9.80% for QYLD. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 2.47% for GNR.
GNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GNR and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNR and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer