GNR vs. OIH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH).
GNR and OIH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010. OIH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both GNR and OIH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GNR or OIH.
Key characteristics
| GNR | OIH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.08% | 3.65% |
| 1Y Return | 13.06% | 28.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.08% | 16.24% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.73% | 2.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.60% | -9.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.69 | 0.98 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.33% | 25.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.37% | -94.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.45% | -71.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNR and OIH is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GNR vs. OIH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has outperformed OIH with an annualized return of 4.60%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively lower -9.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GNR vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GNR vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GNR vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison
GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than OIH's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 3.21% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% | 2.59% | 2.46% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 1.32% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.20% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% | 2.38% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
GNR vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and OIH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GNR vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) is 4.69%, while VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that GNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.