GNK vs. ZIM
GNK (Genco Shipping & Trading Limited) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, GNK returned 17.61%/yr vs 20.82%/yr for ZIM. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GNK vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNK achieves a 36.05% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 22.75% return.
GNK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 36.05%
- 6M
- 33.02%
- 1Y
- 94.84%
- 3Y*
- 29.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 22.14%
ZIM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 22.75%
- 6M
- 32.96%
- 1Y
- 57.00%
- 3Y*
- 44.69%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GNK vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading Limited | 36.05% | 39.12% | -8.87% | 14.44% | 11.41% | 118.52% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 22.75% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNK and ZIM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between GNK and ZIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GNK:
$1.07B
ZIM:
$3.04B
GNK:
$212.52
ZIM:
$0.81
GNK:
0.11
ZIM:
31.03
GNK:
0.01
ZIM:
0.48
GNK:
0.00
ZIM:
0.79
GNK:
$114.70B
ZIM:
$6.29B
GNK:
$72.12B
ZIM:
$676.00M
GNK:
$112.04M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNK vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
GNK
ZIM
GNK vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.79 | 1.08 | +1.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 2.10 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 1.93 | +2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 4.68 | +9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 1.08 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.32 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.76 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
GNK vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNK drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNK and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -84.68% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.16% | -30.66% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.06% | -57.12% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -84.68% | +30.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.86% | -11.70% | -70.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.20% | -40.07% | -48.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 12.62% | -5.98% |
Volatility
GNK vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is 11.73%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that GNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNK | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.73% | 14.46% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.88% | 37.53% | -10.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.25% | 52.94% | -18.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.67% | 65.96% | -24.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.12% | 67.73% | -8.61% |
Dividends
GNK vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
GNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than ZIM's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading Limited | 4.76% | 4.07% | 11.26% | 5.73% | 17.84% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.71% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.96% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GNK vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genco Shipping & Trading Limited and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GNK vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
GNK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a gross profit of 72.06B and revenue of 114.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
GNK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported an operating income of 13.31M and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
GNK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GNK and ZIM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to GNK (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNK dropped -98.25% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
GNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNK and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer