GNE vs. PCYO

In the year-to-date period, GNE achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than PCYO's -18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GNE has outperformed PCYO with an annualized return of 8.93%, while PCYO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the PCYO Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNE and PCYO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while PCYO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GNE drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, smaller than the maximum PCYO drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNE and PCYO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) at 6.36%. This indicates that GNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCYO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genie Energy Ltd. and Pure Cycle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.