GNE vs. PCYO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO).

Performance

GNE vs. PCYO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GNE vs. PCYO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GNE Genie Energy Ltd.	2.41%	-9.91%	-43.56%	177.26%	95.26%	-21.65%	-2.76%	32.91%	46.22%	-20.42%
PCYO Pure Cycle Corporation	-6.19%	-13.33%	21.11%	-0.10%	-28.22%	30.01%	-10.80%	26.79%	18.92%	51.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GNE : $370.50M PCYO : $249.05M
EPS GNE : $0.18 PCYO : $0.57
PE Ratio GNE : 76.58 PCYO : 18.13
PEG Ratio GNE : 1.31 PCYO : 1.45
PS Ratio GNE : 0.77 PCYO : 8.45
PB Ratio GNE : 1.86 PCYO : 1.69
Total Revenue (TTM) GNE : $483.28M PCYO : $29.47M
Gross Profit (TTM) GNE : $124.32M PCYO : $17.37M
EBITDA (TTM) GNE : $10.64M PCYO : $21.04M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNE achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than PCYO's -6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GNE has outperformed PCYO with an annualized return of 10.11%, while PCYO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.

GNE

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: -5.32%
• 1Y: -9.61%
• 3Y*: 2.40%
• 5Y*: 19.30%
• 10Y*: 10.11%

PCYO

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -6.19%
• 6M: -6.19%
• 1Y: -3.46%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: -5.19%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GNE vs. PCYO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNE

GNE Risk / Return Rank: 32
GNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GNE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GNE Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PCYO

PCYO Risk / Return Rank: 34
PCYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PCYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PCYO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PCYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PCYO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNE vs. PCYO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GNE	PCYO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	-0.12	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	0.04	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.00	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	-0.09	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	-0.21	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GNE vs. PCYO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the PCYO Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNE and PCYO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GNE	PCYO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	-0.12	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	-0.16	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.24	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.06	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GNE and PCYO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GNE vs. PCYO - Dividend Comparison

GNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while PCYO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNE Genie Energy Ltd.	2.14%	2.18%	1.92%	1.07%	3.72%	1.44%	4.58%	3.88%	4.98%	6.88%	4.17%	1.08%
PCYO Pure Cycle Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GNE vs. PCYO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNE drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, smaller than the maximum PCYO drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNE and PCYO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GNE	PCYO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.12%	-89.13%	+14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.73%	-17.50%	-33.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.89%	-52.49%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.65%	-52.49%	-5.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.15%	-37.29%	-14.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.14%	-52.56%	+9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.68%	7.30%	+31.38%

Volatility

GNE vs. PCYO - Volatility Comparison

Genie Energy Ltd. (GNE) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) at 8.09%. This indicates that GNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCYO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GNE	PCYO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.82%	8.09%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.84%	19.09%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.58%	29.42%	+9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.32%	32.33%	+10.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.13%	35.69%	+10.44%

Financials

GNE vs. PCYO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genie Energy Ltd. and Pure Cycle Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GNE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genie Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 30.02M and revenue of 138.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.

PCYO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.25M and revenue of 9.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

GNE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genie Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 6.93M and revenue of 138.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

PCYO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 9.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

GNE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genie Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 138.32M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

PCYO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pure Cycle Corporation reported a net income of 4.57M and revenue of 9.14M, resulting in a net margin of 50.0%.