GMOM vs. ITOT
GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. GMOM is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GMOM returned 7.62%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ITOT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
GMOM vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GMOM having a 11.82% return and ITOT slightly lower at 11.78%. Over the past 10 years, GMOM has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 7.62%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
GMOM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
GMOM vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.82% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -9.61% | 20.67% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.78% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and ITOT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GMOM and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
GMOM vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GMOM
ITOT
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
GMOM
ITOT
Industrials
GMOM
ITOT
Basic Materials
GMOM
ITOT
Financial Services
GMOM
ITOT
Utilities
GMOM
ITOT
Technology
GMOM
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
GMOM
ITOT
Communication Services
GMOM
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
GMOM
ITOT
Real Estate
GMOM
ITOT
Healthcare
GMOM
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
ITOT
GMOM vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 3.25 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 14.92 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.37 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.74 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.82 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -55.20% | +30.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -8.90% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.73% | -19.44% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -25.36% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | -35.00% | +9.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.25% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -6.97% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.94% | +0.50% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.94%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 2.94% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 9.14% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 12.19% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 17.35% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 18.26% | -5.44% |
GMOM vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOM vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than ITOT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOM and ITOT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMOM has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.01% vs 7.62% for GMOM. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
GMOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.97% for ITOT.
GMOM is categorized as Momentum, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMOM and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer