PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GMKN.ME vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GMKN.MEBTU
YTD Return-29.56%11.30%
1Y Return-34.74%21.76%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.92%33.38%
5Y Return (Ann)-7.24%23.23%
Sharpe Ratio-0.000.55
Sortino Ratio96.651.06
Omega Ratio37.321.12
Calmar Ratio-0.330.38
Martin Ratio-0.421.62
Ulcer Index77.96%11.94%
Daily Std Dev9,823.42%34.98%
Max Drawdown-99.37%-98.08%
Current Drawdown-99.24%-36.70%

Fundamentals


GMKN.MEBTU
Market CapRUB 2.61T$3.26B
EPSRUB 604.76$3.79
PE Ratio6.367.07
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)RUB 3.62B$4.27B
Gross Profit (TTM)RUB 2.11B$566.90M
EBITDA (TTM)RUB 1.70B$866.30M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between GMKN.ME and BTU is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GMKN.ME achieves a -29.56% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's 11.30% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-30.74%
19.98%
GMKN.ME
BTU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel (GMKN.ME) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMKN.ME
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at 95.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.0095.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at 32.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.0032.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.50
BTU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.06

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMKN.ME Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMKN.ME and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.80JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.00
0.37
GMKN.ME
BTU

Dividends

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

GMKN.ME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 593.01%, more than BTU's 0.84% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GMKN.ME
Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel
593.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.98%11.94%10.61%6.18%6.66%14.18%12.51%4.09%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
0.84%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMKN.ME drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMKN.ME and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.29%
-36.70%
GMKN.ME
BTU

Volatility

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel (GMKN.ME) is 12.91%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 13.97%. This indicates that GMKN.ME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.91%
13.97%
GMKN.ME
BTU

Financials

GMKN.ME vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. GMKN.ME values in RUB, BTU values in USD