GMF vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
GMF and XCEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. Both GMF and XCEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GMF or XCEM.
Key characteristics
| GMF | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.38% | 4.39% |
| 1Y Return | 18.41% | 16.78% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.17% | 1.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.22% | 7.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.24 | 1.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.13% | 12.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.18% | -40.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.53% | -1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMF and XCEM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GMF vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 4.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMF vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GMF vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GMF vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than XCEM's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 2.47% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 1.55% | 2.18% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 1.17% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 3.24% | 8.57% | 1.24% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GMF vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GMF vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 3.17%. This indicates that GMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.