PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMED vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMED vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMED achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GMED has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.16%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.60% annualized return.


GMED

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-5.94%
6M
-7.14%
1Y
39.99%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
13.16%

VOO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
8.08%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMED vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
-5.94%5.56%55.21%-28.25%2.87%10.70%10.77%36.04%5.30%65.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GMED and VOO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.47

The correlation between GMED and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMED vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMED
GMED Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMED Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMED Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMED vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMEDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.51

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

11.16

-6.56

GMED vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMED and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMED vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMED drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMED and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMEDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-33.99%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-8.90%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-18.69%

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.91%

-24.52%

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

-33.99%

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.18%

-3.23%

-11.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-3.68%

-11.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.70%

2.00%

+6.70%

Volatility

GMED vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.80%. This indicates that GMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMEDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.14%

4.80%

+6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.69%

9.79%

+13.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.70%

12.43%

+36.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.06%

16.91%

+21.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.54%

18.02%

+17.52%

Dividends

GMED vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMED and VOO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMED has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to VOO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMED dropped -47.91% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMED and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer