PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLXY.TO vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLXY.TO is traded in CAD, while MARA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MARA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


GLXY.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARA

1D
-0.47%
1M
16.59%
YTD
56.69%
6M
11.19%
1Y
-9.92%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
-8.06%
10Y*
-10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLXY.TO
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd.
-8.04%22.97%141.92%166.93%-82.91%107.80%928.30%6.00%-20.87%-33.33%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
56.69%-48.91%-22.47%571.71%-88.85%211.91%1,064.46%-42.15%-90.42%-44.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GLXY.TO and MARA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2012

0.39

The correlation between GLXY.TO and MARA shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GLXY.TO:

CA$1.16

MARA:

-$4.95

PS Ratio

GLXY.TO:

0.14

MARA:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

CA$57.33B

MARA:

$867.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

-CA$151.88M

MARA:

$164.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

CA$194.57M

MARA:

$373.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLXY.TO vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLXY.TO

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLXY.TOMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

Drawdowns

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLXY.TOMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.69%

Volatility

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLXY.TOMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.01%

Dividends

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLXY.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. and MARA Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
10.04B
174.61M
(GLXY.TO) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GLXY.TO values in CAD, MARA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GLXY.TO and MARA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLXY.TO and MARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer