PortfoliosLab logo
GLXY.TO vs. MARA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLXY.TO and MARA is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,023.26%
253.71%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLXY.TO:

1.30

MARA:

-0.30

Sortino Ratio

GLXY.TO:

1.98

MARA:

0.14

Omega Ratio

GLXY.TO:

1.24

MARA:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

GLXY.TO:

1.46

MARA:

-0.33

Martin Ratio

GLXY.TO:

4.26

MARA:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

GLXY.TO:

24.33%

MARA:

35.18%

Daily Std Dev

GLXY.TO:

85.31%

MARA:

96.63%

Max Drawdown

GLXY.TO:

-91.88%

MARA:

-99.74%

Current Drawdown

GLXY.TO:

-35.09%

MARA:

-90.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLXY.TO:

CA$9.29B

MARA:

$5.10B

EPS

GLXY.TO:

CA$0.76

MARA:

$1.72

PE Ratio

GLXY.TO:

34.88

MARA:

8.42

PS Ratio

GLXY.TO:

34.67

MARA:

7.04

PB Ratio

GLXY.TO:

2.48

MARA:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

CA$51.00M

MARA:

$491.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

-CA$13.84M

MARA:

-$156.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

GLXY.TO:

-CA$151.75M

MARA:

$598.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLXY.TO achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's -14.79% return.


GLXY.TO

YTD

10.72%

1M

109.30%

6M

16.60%

1Y

110.10%

5Y*

84.31%

10Y*

N/A

MARA

YTD

-14.79%

1M

35.84%

6M

-26.00%

1Y

-28.87%

5Y*

74.15%

10Y*

-16.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLXY.TO vs. MARA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLXY.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLXY.TO is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLXY.TO is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLXY.TO is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLXY.TO is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLXY.TO is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLXY.TO is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MARA is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MARA is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MARA is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MARA is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MARA is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MARA is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GLXY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLXY.TO and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.23
-0.30
GLXY.TO
MARA

Dividends

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLXY.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.88%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY.TO and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-41.59%
-81.22%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Volatility

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) have volatilities of 27.20% and 27.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
27.20%
27.54%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Financials

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober0
214.39M
(GLXY.TO) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GLXY.TO values in CAD, MARA values in USD