PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLXY.TO vs. MARA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLXY.TOMARA
YTD Return142.01%-11.49%
1Y Return208.64%103.03%
3Y Return (Ann)-15.29%-27.93%
5Y Return (Ann)86.32%78.97%
Sharpe Ratio2.961.15
Sortino Ratio3.202.15
Omega Ratio1.381.25
Calmar Ratio2.991.35
Martin Ratio16.493.45
Ulcer Index14.99%36.74%
Daily Std Dev83.62%110.54%
Max Drawdown-91.88%-99.74%
Current Drawdown-41.36%-86.56%

Fundamentals


GLXY.TOMARA
Market CapCA$8.84B$7.43B
EPSCA$4.55$0.90
PE Ratio5.6928.03
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$280.46M$467.11M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$173.15M-$31.83M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$19.65M-$215.57M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GLXY.TO and MARA is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLXY.TO achieves a 142.01% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's -11.49% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
92.48%
5.80%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLXY.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 14.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.01
MARA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MARA, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MARA, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.75

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLXY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLXY.TO and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.60
0.93
GLXY.TO
MARA

Dividends

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLXY.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.88%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY.TO and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.71%
-72.68%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Volatility

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) is 33.49%, while Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 40.54%. This indicates that GLXY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
33.49%
40.54%
GLXY.TO
MARA

Financials

GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. GLXY.TO values in CAD, MARA values in USD