GLXY.TO vs. MARA
Compare and contrast key facts about Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA).
Performance
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLXY.TO Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. | -8.04% | 22.97% | 141.92% | 166.93% | -82.91% | 107.80% | 928.30% | 6.00% | -20.87% | -33.33% |
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | -7.90% | -48.91% | -22.47% | 571.71% | -88.85% | 211.91% | 1,064.46% | -42.15% | -90.42% | -44.20% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLXY.TO is traded in CAD, while MARA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MARA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
GLXY.TO:
CA$1.14
MARA:
-$4.32
GLXY.TO:
0.18
MARA:
2.73
GLXY.TO:
CA$58.24B
MARA:
$907.09M
GLXY.TO:
CA$10.84B
MARA:
$576.49M
GLXY.TO:
CA$10.79B
MARA:
-$559.37M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXY.TO achieves a -8.04% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's -11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GLXY.TO has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 31.02%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -12.45% annualized return.
GLXY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -39.96%
- 1Y
- 86.29%
- 3Y*
- 80.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 31.02%
MARA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -57.31%
- 1Y
- -34.42%
- 3Y*
- -2.72%
- 5Y*
- -29.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXY.TO vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank
GLXY.TO
MARA
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLXY.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | -0.43 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | -0.18 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | -0.55 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | -1.05 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLXY.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | -0.43 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | -0.28 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | -0.09 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | -0.10 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXY.TO and MARA is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLXY.TO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY.TO and MARA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXY.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -99.74% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.64% | -70.53% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.88% | -95.87% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.88% | -99.20% | +7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.81% | -94.73% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.29% | -77.82% | -15.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.86% | 36.95% | -8.09% |
Volatility
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) has a higher volatility of 29.63% compared to Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 25.14%. This indicates that GLXY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLXY.TO | MARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.63% | 25.14% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.05% | 61.18% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.72% | 81.22% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.42% | 105.87% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.84% | 143.03% | -26.19% |
Financials
GLXY.TO vs. MARA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities