PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLXY.TOHUT.TO
YTD Return142.01%83.94%
1Y Return208.64%138.24%
3Y Return (Ann)-15.29%-29.21%
5Y Return (Ann)86.32%32.06%
Sharpe Ratio2.961.43
Sortino Ratio3.202.30
Omega Ratio1.381.26
Calmar Ratio2.991.78
Martin Ratio16.493.94
Ulcer Index14.99%41.15%
Daily Std Dev83.62%113.10%
Max Drawdown-91.88%-94.44%
Current Drawdown-41.36%-67.15%

Fundamentals


GLXY.TOHUT.TO
Market CapCA$8.84BCA$3.20B
EPSCA$4.55-CA$1.09
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$280.46MCA$122.76M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$173.15MCA$32.68M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$19.65MCA$6.70M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GLXY.TO and HUT.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLXY.TO achieves a 142.01% return, which is significantly higher than HUT.TO's 83.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
92.48%
159.23%
GLXY.TO
HUT.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) and Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLXY.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 15.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.57
HUT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 3.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.70

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLXY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the HUT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLXY.TO and HUT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.82
1.36
GLXY.TO
HUT.TO

Dividends

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLXY.TO nor HUT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.88%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT.TO drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY.TO and HUT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.71%
-70.93%
GLXY.TO
HUT.TO

Volatility

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) is 33.49%, while Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO) has a volatility of 36.83%. This indicates that GLXY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
33.49%
36.83%
GLXY.TO
HUT.TO

Financials

GLXY.TO vs. HUT.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. and Hut 8 Mining Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items