GLTR vs. COMM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L).
GLTR and COMM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. COMM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity. It was launched on Jul 18, 2017. Both GLTR and COMM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLTR or COMM.L.
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and COMM.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLTR:
1.60
COMM.L:
-0.20
GLTR:
2.16
COMM.L:
-0.19
GLTR:
1.28
COMM.L:
0.98
GLTR:
2.04
COMM.L:
-0.09
GLTR:
6.96
COMM.L:
-0.37
GLTR:
4.48%
COMM.L:
6.84%
GLTR:
19.61%
COMM.L:
12.96%
GLTR:
-55.70%
COMM.L:
-28.49%
GLTR:
0.00%
COMM.L:
-20.51%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 23.72% return, which is significantly higher than COMM.L's -0.43% return.
GLTR
23.72%
8.44%
14.41%
30.54%
11.67%
8.53%
COMM.L
-0.43%
-4.83%
4.19%
-1.93%
12.14%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLTR vs. COMM.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLTR
COMM.L
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than COMM.L's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and COMM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLTR vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) at 6.48%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.