GLRY vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
GLRY and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLRY is an actively managed fund by Inspire. It was launched on Dec 7, 2020. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 3.74% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 1.08% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 20.98% | 2.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's 1.08% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- —
XMHQ
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
XMHQ
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.68 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.14 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.14 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.09 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 3.97 | +4.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.68 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.39 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and XMHQ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than XMHQ's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and XMHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -58.19% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -12.54% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | -25.47% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -5.36% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -9.35% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.43% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GLRY vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) at 6.03%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 6.03% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.06% | 11.37% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.75% | 20.26% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 20.76% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 20.69% | +0.79% |