GLRY vs. IMCG
GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. GLRY is actively managed, while IMCG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.85%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for IMCG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCG.
Performance
GLRY vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 20.36% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCG
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
GLRY vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 16.65% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 20.36% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and IMCG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between GLRY and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
GLRY vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRY
IMCG
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
GLRY
IMCG
Industrials
GLRY
IMCG
Consumer Cyclical
GLRY
IMCG
Financial Services
GLRY
IMCG
Healthcare
GLRY
IMCG
Utilities
GLRY
IMCG
Real Estate
GLRY
IMCG
Energy
GLRY
IMCG
Basic Materials
GLRY
IMCG
Communication Services
GLRY
IMCG
Consumer Defensive
GLRY
IMCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
IMCG
GLRY vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.62 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 2.31 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.48 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 9.66 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.62 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and IMCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -58.96% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -10.17% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -21.92% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | -35.08% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -9.22% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.61% | +0.52% |
Volatility
GLRY vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 4.62%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 4.62% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 12.57% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 15.53% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 20.17% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 20.52% | +0.89% |
GLRY vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRY vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IMCG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.65% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRY and IMCG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IMCG (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs IMCG's -58.96%.
On 5-year performance, IMCG leads with 8.90% vs 8.85% for GLRY. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 8.90% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while IMCG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.06% for IMCG.
GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLRY and IMCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer