GLPEY vs. TTE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Galp Energa (GLPEY) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE).

Performance

GLPEY vs. TTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galp Energa (GLPEY) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLPEY vs. TTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLPEY Galp Energa	39.95%	6.03%	16.44%	13.97%	46.30%	-1.73%	-34.94%	13.14%	-12.26%	27.66%
TTE TotalEnergies SE	38.71%	29.97%	-11.58%	10.48%	37.55%	56.52%	-9.98%	15.41%	-2.56%	12.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GLPEY : $34.73B TTE : $195.36B
EPS GLPEY : $0.38 TTE : $5.97
PE Ratio GLPEY : 31.31 TTE : 15.04
PEG Ratio GLPEY : 0.21 TTE : 7.32
PS Ratio GLPEY : 1.80 TTE : 1.08
PB Ratio GLPEY : 7.86 TTE : 1.70
Total Revenue (TTM) GLPEY : $19.45B TTE : $182.57B
Gross Profit (TTM) GLPEY : $2.14B TTE : $36.55B
EBITDA (TTM) GLPEY : $2.90B TTE : $38.29B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLPEY having a 39.95% return and TTE slightly lower at 38.71%. Over the past 10 years, GLPEY has underperformed TTE with an annualized return of 11.84%, while TTE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.42% annualized return.

GLPEY

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 39.95%
• 6M: 21.34%
• 1Y: 40.58%
• 3Y*: 33.08%
• 5Y*: 20.34%
• 10Y*: 11.84%

TTE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 11.93%
• YTD: 38.71%
• 6M: 50.49%
• 1Y: 45.13%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 17.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GLPEY vs. TTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLPEY

GLPEY Risk / Return Rank: 73
GLPEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GLPEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GLPEY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GLPEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GLPEY Martin Ratio Rank: 74

TTE

TTE Risk / Return Rank: 83
TTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TTE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
TTE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLPEY vs. TTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galp Energa (GLPEY) and TotalEnergies SE (TTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLPEY	TTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.65	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.19	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	2.55	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	8.33	-3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLPEY vs. TTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLPEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the TTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLPEY and TTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLPEY	TTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.65	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.73	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.47	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.19	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between GLPEY and TTE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLPEY vs. TTE - Dividend Comparison

GLPEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than TTE's 3.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLPEY Galp Energa	3.16%	4.42%	3.64%	3.92%	3.89%	7.47%	3.95%	4.48%	4.32%	3.86%	6.87%	1.72%
TTE TotalEnergies SE	3.29%	8.12%	9.09%	4.60%	8.41%	27.22%	10.10%	6.52%	4.07%	4.51%	4.77%	5.46%

Drawdowns

GLPEY vs. TTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLPEY drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TTE drawdown of -62.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLPEY and TTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLPEY	TTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.00%	-62.81%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.19%	-16.64%	-6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.72%	-24.95%	-10.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.98%	-62.81%	+4.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-1.32%	-5.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.46%	-19.13%	-6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.79%	5.35%	+3.44%

Volatility

GLPEY vs. TTE - Volatility Comparison

Galp Energa (GLPEY) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to TotalEnergies SE (TTE) at 6.76%. This indicates that GLPEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLPEY	TTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	6.76%	+4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.63%	16.97%	+9.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.34%	27.46%	+6.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.18%	36.75%	-3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.30%	37.62%	-3.32%

Financials

GLPEY vs. TTE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Galp Energa and TotalEnergies SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GLPEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galp Energa reported a gross profit of 423.00M and revenue of 4.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 46.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.8%.

GLPEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galp Energa reported an operating income of 434.88M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 4.55B and revenue of 46.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

GLPEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galp Energa reported a net income of 177.32M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 2.93B and revenue of 46.34B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.