PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLP vs. NDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLP vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Partners LP (GLP) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLP vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLP
Global Partners LP
2.25%-4.39%17.27%35.29%26.11%
NDIV
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF
35.88%2.85%6.18%15.52%1.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLP achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 35.88% return.


GLP

1D
-0.71%
1M
-10.39%
YTD
2.25%
6M
-9.22%
1Y
-15.83%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
23.88%
10Y*
23.83%

NDIV

1D
-1.25%
1M
11.41%
YTD
35.88%
6M
30.00%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLP vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLP
GLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NDIV
NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLP vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Partners LP (GLP) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLPNDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

1.31

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

1.79

-2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.25

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

1.75

-2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.23

5.40

-6.63

GLP vs. NDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLP Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the NDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLP and NDIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLPNDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

1.31

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.80

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between GLP and NDIV is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GLP vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison

GLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than NDIV's 5.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLP
Global Partners LP
7.15%7.14%6.14%8.48%6.93%12.28%11.30%10.14%11.50%11.08%9.51%15.57%
NDIV
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF
5.08%5.64%5.88%7.37%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLP vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLP drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than NDIV's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLP and NDIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLPNDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.18%

-19.73%

-61.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.22%

-17.75%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.97%

-1.27%

-23.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-4.27%

-19.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.70%

5.77%

+7.93%

Volatility

GLP vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison

Global Partners LP (GLP) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) at 3.77%. This indicates that GLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLPNDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

3.77%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

14.10%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.52%

24.42%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.05%

20.98%

+15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.20%

20.98%

+17.22%