PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLO.TO vs. URNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLO.TO and URNM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

GLO.TO vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Atomic Corporation (GLO.TO) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-59.01%
-3.73%
GLO.TO
URNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLO.TO:

-0.91

URNM:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

GLO.TO:

-1.82

URNM:

-0.78

Omega Ratio

GLO.TO:

0.76

URNM:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

GLO.TO:

-0.92

URNM:

-0.73

Martin Ratio

GLO.TO:

-1.44

URNM:

-1.31

Ulcer Index

GLO.TO:

57.43%

URNM:

20.22%

Daily Std Dev

GLO.TO:

90.63%

URNM:

40.11%

Max Drawdown

GLO.TO:

-94.74%

URNM:

-42.55%

Current Drawdown

GLO.TO:

-88.30%

URNM:

-34.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLO.TO achieves a -26.92% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's -6.85% return.


GLO.TO

YTD

-26.92%

1M

-34.48%

6M

-59.29%

1Y

-81.61%

5Y*

4.41%

10Y*

15.34%

URNM

YTD

-6.85%

1M

-10.23%

6M

-6.10%

1Y

-22.64%

5Y*

29.14%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLO.TO vs. URNM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLO.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLO.TO is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLO.TO is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLO.TO is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLO.TO is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLO.TO is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLO.TO is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

URNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URNM is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URNM is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URNM is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URNM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLO.TO vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Atomic Corporation (GLO.TO) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLO.TO, currently valued at -0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.92-0.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLO.TO, currently valued at -1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.88-0.52
The chart of Omega ratio for GLO.TO, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.750.94
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLO.TO, currently valued at -0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.91-0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for GLO.TO, currently valued at -1.42, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.42-0.99
GLO.TO
URNM

The current GLO.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLO.TO and URNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.92
-0.51
GLO.TO
URNM

Dividends

GLO.TO vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

GLO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.


TTM20242023202220212020
GLO.TO
Global Atomic Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF
3.40%3.17%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Drawdowns

GLO.TO vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO.TO and URNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-89.48%
-34.34%
GLO.TO
URNM

Volatility

GLO.TO vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Global Atomic Corporation (GLO.TO) has a higher volatility of 49.40% compared to NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) at 15.01%. This indicates that GLO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
49.40%
15.01%
GLO.TO
URNM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab