PortfoliosLab logo
GLIF vs. IGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLIF and IGF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GLIF vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ Global Infrastructure ETF (GLIF) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


GLIF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IGF

YTD

12.88%

1M

4.63%

6M

7.64%

1Y

22.81%

3Y*

8.14%

5Y*

11.70%

10Y*

6.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGFiQ Global Infrastructure ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

GLIF vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLIF vs. IGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLIF is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLIF is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLIF is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLIF is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLIF is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLIF is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGF is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGF is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGF is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLIF vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ Global Infrastructure ETF (GLIF) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GLIF vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

GLIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLIF
AGFiQ Global Infrastructure ETF
0.00%0.22%2.79%3.56%2.49%2.73%2.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.85%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.99%3.24%3.00%

Drawdowns

GLIF vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GLIF vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...