PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLG vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLG and BAC is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

GLG vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TD Holdings, Inc. (GLG) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-100.00%
20.82%
GLG
BAC

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLG:

$221.06K

BAC:

$357.41B

EPS

GLG:

-$7.00

BAC:

$3.21

Returns By Period


GLG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BAC

YTD

6.85%

1M

-0.30%

6M

20.82%

1Y

41.34%

5Y*

8.84%

10Y*

13.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLG vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLG

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLG vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Holdings, Inc. (GLG) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLG, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.212.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLG, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.083.08
The chart of Omega ratio for GLG, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLG, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.081.61
The chart of Martin ratio for GLG, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.258.46
GLG
BAC


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.21
2.10
GLG
BAC

Dividends

GLG vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

GLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLG
TD Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.13%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

GLG vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-100.00%
-1.63%
GLG
BAC

Volatility

GLG vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Holdings, Inc. (GLG) is 0.00%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that GLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
4.48%
GLG
BAC

Financials

GLG vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TD Holdings, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab