PortfoliosLab logo
GLG vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GLG and BAC is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GLG vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TD Holdings, Inc. (GLG) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLG:

$221.06K

BAC:

$325.75B

EPS

GLG:

-$7.00

BAC:

$3.35

PS Ratio

GLG:

0.29

BAC:

3.34

PB Ratio

GLG:

0.28

BAC:

1.22

Returns By Period


GLG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BAC

YTD

-0.83%

1M

13.02%

6M

-5.67%

1Y

11.62%

3Y*

9.37%

5Y*

16.70%

10Y*

12.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TD Holdings, Inc.

Bank of America Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLG vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLG

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLG vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Holdings, Inc. (GLG) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

GLG vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

GLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLG
TD Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.36%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

GLG vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

GLG vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

GLG vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TD Holdings, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
33.91M
46.99B
(GLG) Total Revenue
(BAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items