GLFOX vs. PHYQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX).
GLFOX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 31, 2009. PHYQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011.
Performance
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.93% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 | -0.77% | 9.18% | 8.55% | 12.34% | -12.22% | 5.99% | 5.79% | 16.29% | -1.18% | 7.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than PHYQX's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has outperformed PHYQX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while PHYQX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.88% annualized return.
GLFOX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
PHYQX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than PHYQX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLFOX vs. PHYQX — Risk / Return Rank
GLFOX
PHYQX
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLFOX | PHYQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 1.79 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.67 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.43 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 9.84 | +1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLFOX | PHYQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.79 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.78 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 1.08 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.12 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLFOX and PHYQX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Dividend Comparison
GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than PHYQX's 6.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.12% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 | 6.58% | 7.07% | 7.53% | 7.09% | 6.29% | 6.23% | 6.56% | 6.32% | 6.64% | 6.38% | 4.88% | 7.05% |
Drawdowns
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, which is greater than PHYQX's maximum drawdown of -21.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and PHYQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLFOX | PHYQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -21.12% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -2.94% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.14% | -16.05% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -21.12% | -8.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.14% | -1.86% | -4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -2.25% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.72% | +1.47% |
Volatility
GLFOX vs. PHYQX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) at 1.41%. This indicates that GLFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLFOX | PHYQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 1.41% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 2.46% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 3.78% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.72% | 5.05% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 5.47% | +7.80% |