PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLEN.L vs. BA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLEN.LBA.L
YTD Return-15.42%27.00%
1Y Return-7.07%29.39%
3Y Return (Ann)5.35%38.17%
5Y Return (Ann)10.33%23.76%
10Y Return (Ann)2.84%16.06%
Sharpe Ratio-0.241.35
Sortino Ratio-0.161.86
Omega Ratio0.981.24
Calmar Ratio-0.192.40
Martin Ratio-0.495.31
Ulcer Index13.24%5.23%
Daily Std Dev27.27%20.48%
Max Drawdown-86.15%-84.49%
Current Drawdown-28.15%-0.68%

Fundamentals


GLEN.LBA.L
Market Cap£48.78B£40.97B
EPS-£0.03£0.60
PEG Ratio0.413.52
Total Revenue (TTM)£227.51B£24.56B
Gross Profit (TTM)£6.97B£2.19B
EBITDA (TTM)£11.74B£3.26B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GLEN.L and BA.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLEN.L achieves a -15.42% return, which is significantly lower than BA.L's 27.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GLEN.L has underperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 2.84%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.41%
2.92%
GLEN.L
BA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore plc (GLEN.L) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLEN.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLEN.L, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLEN.L, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLEN.L, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLEN.L, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLEN.L, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.09
BA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BA.L, currently valued at 7.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.71

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLEN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLEN.L and BA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.04
1.69
GLEN.L
BA.L

Dividends

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

GLEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.29%, more than BA.L's 2.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLEN.L
Glencore plc
106.29%300.59%3.83%2.31%6.71%6.74%5.12%1.58%0.00%395.16%206.57%3.33%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
2.24%2.53%2.99%4.40%7.57%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%4.30%4.53%

Drawdowns

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLEN.L drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, roughly equal to the maximum BA.L drawdown of -84.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEN.L and BA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.92%
-0.83%
GLEN.L
BA.L

Volatility

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

Glencore plc (GLEN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to BAE Systems plc (BA.L) at 8.11%. This indicates that GLEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.58%
8.11%
GLEN.L
BA.L

Financials

GLEN.L vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glencore plc and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items