GLDW.L vs. QGRW
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW).
GLDW.L and QGRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDW.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Nov 30, 2020. QGRW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2022. Both GLDW.L and QGRW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLDW.L or QGRW.
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW.L and QGRW is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLDW.L:
2.62
QGRW:
1.69
GLDW.L:
3.55
QGRW:
2.25
GLDW.L:
1.48
QGRW:
1.30
GLDW.L:
5.84
QGRW:
2.28
GLDW.L:
13.47
QGRW:
8.33
GLDW.L:
2.66%
QGRW:
3.97%
GLDW.L:
13.66%
QGRW:
19.63%
GLDW.L:
-9.93%
QGRW:
-14.54%
GLDW.L:
-0.46%
QGRW:
-5.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW.L achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's -1.08% return.
GLDW.L
5.38%
4.08%
16.86%
36.05%
N/A
N/A
QGRW
-1.08%
-4.04%
5.10%
32.89%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLDW.L vs. QGRW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GLDW.L
QGRW
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
GLDW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDW.L WisdomTree Core Physical Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW.L drawdown since its inception was -9.93%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW.L and QGRW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLDW.L vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) is 3.90%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that GLDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.