PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLDA.L vs. GFI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLDA.L vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.89%
-12.39%
GLDA.L
GFI

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDA.L achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's 3.26% return.


GLDA.L

YTD

27.21%

1M

-0.88%

6M

8.12%

1Y

29.37%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

GFI

YTD

3.26%

1M

-19.31%

6M

-12.39%

1Y

15.66%

5Y (annualized)

25.44%

10Y (annualized)

15.14%

Key characteristics


GLDA.LGFI
Sharpe Ratio0.870.31
Sortino Ratio1.480.74
Omega Ratio1.391.10
Calmar Ratio1.500.55
Martin Ratio4.051.09
Ulcer Index7.57%14.05%
Daily Std Dev35.17%49.91%
Max Drawdown-21.57%-86.06%
Current Drawdown-3.55%-23.11%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GLDA.L and GFI is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLDA.L vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLDA.L, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.860.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLDA.L, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.450.64
The chart of Omega ratio for GLDA.L, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLDA.L, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.480.40
The chart of Martin ratio for GLDA.L, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.110.78
GLDA.L
GFI

The current GLDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDA.L and GFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.200.400.600.801.001.20JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.86
0.23
GLDA.L
GFI

Dividends

GLDA.L vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

GLDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLDA.L
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
2.67%2.86%3.40%3.24%1.73%0.80%1.62%1.77%1.69%0.72%0.86%2.66%

Drawdowns

GLDA.L vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.L and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.67%
-23.11%
GLDA.L
GFI

Volatility

GLDA.L vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) is 5.39%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that GLDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.39%
14.67%
GLDA.L
GFI