GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
GLDA.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDA.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on May 21, 2019. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both GLDA.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLDA.L or CSPX.L.
Performance
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.L achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 24.58% return.
GLDA.L
27.21%
-0.88%
8.12%
29.37%
N/A
N/A
CSPX.L
24.58%
0.85%
11.47%
32.54%
15.14%
12.73%
Key characteristics
| GLDA.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 2.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.48 | 3.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.50 | 4.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.05 | 17.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.57% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.17% | 11.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.57% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.55% | -1.73% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.L and CSPX.L is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLDA.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that GLDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.