PortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and PHYS is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

GLD vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
181.52%
165.38%
GLD
PHYS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLD:

2.57

PHYS:

2.46

Sortino Ratio

GLD:

3.39

PHYS:

3.11

Omega Ratio

GLD:

1.44

PHYS:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

GLD:

5.28

PHYS:

4.43

Martin Ratio

GLD:

14.46

PHYS:

12.49

Ulcer Index

GLD:

2.97%

PHYS:

3.28%

Daily Std Dev

GLD:

16.75%

PHYS:

16.64%

Max Drawdown

GLD:

-45.56%

PHYS:

-48.16%

Current Drawdown

GLD:

-2.38%

PHYS:

-2.86%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLD having a 27.23% return and PHYS slightly lower at 26.37%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 10.35% annualized return and PHYS not far behind at 9.87%.


GLD

YTD

27.23%

1M

10.63%

6M

21.86%

1Y

43.53%

5Y*

13.67%

10Y*

10.35%

PHYS

YTD

26.37%

1M

8.85%

6M

19.76%

1Y

41.47%

5Y*

12.84%

10Y*

9.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLD vs. PHYS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLD vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLD, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GLD: 2.57
PHYS: 2.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLD, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GLD: 3.39
PHYS: 3.11
The chart of Omega ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GLD: 1.44
PHYS: 1.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLD, currently valued at 5.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GLD: 5.28
PHYS: 4.43
The chart of Martin ratio for GLD, currently valued at 14.46, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GLD: 14.46
PHYS: 12.49

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.57
2.46
GLD
PHYS

Dividends

GLD vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLD nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLD vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.38%
-2.86%
GLD
PHYS

Volatility

GLD vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) have volatilities of 8.17% and 8.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.17%
8.19%
GLD
PHYS