PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLD vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLD vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.71%
15.14%
GLD
PHYS

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLD having a 30.69% return and PHYS slightly higher at 30.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 8.05% annualized return and PHYS not far behind at 7.72%.


GLD

YTD

30.69%

1M

-0.41%

6M

15.71%

1Y

35.37%

5Y (annualized)

12.67%

10Y (annualized)

8.05%

PHYS

YTD

30.82%

1M

-1.28%

6M

15.14%

1Y

33.85%

5Y (annualized)

12.18%

10Y (annualized)

7.72%

Key characteristics


GLDPHYS
Sharpe Ratio2.382.28
Sortino Ratio3.142.94
Omega Ratio1.411.39
Calmar Ratio4.363.67
Martin Ratio13.9912.60
Ulcer Index2.53%2.69%
Daily Std Dev14.89%14.87%
Max Drawdown-45.56%-48.16%
Current Drawdown-2.97%-3.79%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between GLD and PHYS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLD vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLD, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.382.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLD, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.142.94
The chart of Omega ratio for GLD, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.411.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLD, currently valued at 4.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.363.67
The chart of Martin ratio for GLD, currently valued at 13.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.9912.60
GLD
PHYS

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.38
2.28
GLD
PHYS

Dividends

GLD vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLD nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLD vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.97%
-3.79%
GLD
PHYS

Volatility

GLD vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) is 5.72%, while Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.72%
6.04%
GLD
PHYS