PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
GLD vs. IAUF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GLD vs. IAUF

Last updated May 11, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF).

GLD and IAUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. IAUF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Composite Gold Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. Both GLD and IAUF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLD or IAUF.

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and IAUF is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLD vs. IAUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

GLD

YTD

26.73%

1M

4.96%

6M

23.75%

1Y

40.30%

5Y*

14.04%

10Y*

10.19%

IAUF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GLD vs. IAUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUF's 0.25% expense ratio.

GLD
SPDR Gold Trust
IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLD vs. IAUF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
IAUF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAUF is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAUF is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAUF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLD vs. IAUF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and iShares Gold Strategy ETF (IAUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

GLD vs. IAUF - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLD nor IAUF has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2024202320222021202020192018
GLD
SPDR Gold Trust		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IAUF
iShares Gold Strategy ETF		100.19%100.19%13.18%0.88%0.00%7.61%10.04%0.77%

Drawdowns

GLD vs. IAUF - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

GLD vs. IAUF - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...