PortfoliosLab logo
GL vs. MET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GL and MET is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

GL vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Globe Life Inc. (GL) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,386.98%
606.06%
GL
MET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GL:

2.14

MET:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

GL:

2.71

MET:

0.51

Omega Ratio

GL:

1.37

MET:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

GL:

1.56

MET:

0.33

Martin Ratio

GL:

13.88

MET:

1.12

Ulcer Index

GL:

4.60%

MET:

6.44%

Daily Std Dev

GL:

29.67%

MET:

29.31%

Max Drawdown

GL:

-75.34%

MET:

-82.93%

Current Drawdown

GL:

-7.42%

MET:

-14.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GL:

$10.32B

MET:

$51.68B

EPS

GL:

$11.94

MET:

$5.94

PE Ratio

GL:

10.38

MET:

12.77

PS Ratio

GL:

1.79

MET:

0.73

PB Ratio

GL:

1.93

MET:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

GL:

$4.36B

MET:

$54.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GL:

$4.16B

MET:

$54.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

GL:

$376.94M

MET:

$3.45B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GL achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than MET's -7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GL has outperformed MET with an annualized return of 9.07%, while MET has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


GL

YTD

10.72%

1M

-5.61%

6M

17.43%

1Y

64.31%

5Y*

11.05%

10Y*

9.07%

MET

YTD

-7.58%

1M

-10.41%

6M

-7.51%

1Y

7.67%

5Y*

21.83%

10Y*

7.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GL vs. MET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GL is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GL is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GL is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GL is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GL is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GL is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

MET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MET is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MET is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MET is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MET is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MET is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MET is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GL vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globe Life Inc. (GL) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GL, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GL: 2.14
MET: 0.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for GL, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GL: 2.71
MET: 0.51
The chart of Omega ratio for GL, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GL: 1.37
MET: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for GL, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GL: 1.56
MET: 0.33
The chart of Martin ratio for GL, currently valued at 13.88, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
GL: 13.88
MET: 1.12

The current GL Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the MET Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GL and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.14
0.25
GL
MET

Dividends

GL vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

GL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than MET's 2.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GL
Globe Life Inc.
0.81%0.85%0.73%0.68%0.83%0.78%0.65%0.85%0.65%0.75%0.71%0.94%
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.90%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GL vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GL drawdown since its inception was -75.34%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GL and MET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-7.42%
-14.25%
GL
MET

Volatility

GL vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Globe Life Inc. (GL) is 14.70%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 19.02%. This indicates that GL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.70%
19.02%
GL
MET

Financials

GL vs. MET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globe Life Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items