GL vs. MET
GL (Globe Life Inc.) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Life industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, GL returned 12.34%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for MET. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GL vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GL achieves a 26.08% return, which is significantly higher than MET's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GL has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 12.34%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.
GL
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 26.08%
- 6M
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- 45.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
MET
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
GL vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GL Globe Life Inc. | 26.08% | 26.47% | -7.53% | 1.77% | 29.68% | -0.49% | -8.93% | 42.34% | -17.23% | 23.93% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 13.17% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GL and MET is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.71 |
The correlation between GL and MET shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GL:
$14.47
MET:
$7.21
GL:
12.14
MET:
12.22
GL:
0.66
MET:
0.41
GL:
2.35
MET:
0.57
GL:
$6.08B
MET:
$76.95B
GL:
$2.31B
MET:
$14.75B
GL:
$1.61B
MET:
$4.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GL vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
GL
MET
GL vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globe Life Inc. (GL) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GL | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 0.80 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 2.16 | +7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GL vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GL drawdown since its inception was -75.34%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GL and MET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GL | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.34% | -82.37% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -17.46% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.62% | -21.97% | -39.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.62% | -35.09% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.62% | -55.16% | -6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.91% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -17.61% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 6.42% | -1.72% |
Volatility
GL vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Globe Life Inc. (GL) is 5.60%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that GL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GL | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 6.44% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.87% | 17.46% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 23.22% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 25.60% | +10.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.21% | 30.52% | +1.69% |
Dividends
GL vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
GL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than MET's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GL Globe Life Inc. | 0.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.77% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 0.65% | 0.75% | 0.71% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.61% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Financials
GL vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globe Life Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GL vs. MET - Profitability Comparison
GL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported a gross profit of 770.04M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported an operating income of 368.13M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported a net income of 270.53M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GL and MET have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MET has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to GL (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GL dropped -75.34% vs MET's -82.37%.
GL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GL and MET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer