PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GL vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GLCOST
YTD Return-9.61%40.78%
1Y Return-5.65%59.26%
3Y Return (Ann)5.75%22.92%
5Y Return (Ann)2.79%27.12%
10Y Return (Ann)8.35%23.52%
Sharpe Ratio-0.113.11
Sortino Ratio0.393.74
Omega Ratio1.121.55
Calmar Ratio-0.115.92
Martin Ratio-0.3015.31
Ulcer Index23.33%3.98%
Daily Std Dev64.99%19.56%
Max Drawdown-75.34%-53.39%
Current Drawdown-14.47%-2.11%

Fundamentals


GLCOST
Market Cap$9.26B$413.11B
EPS$11.80$16.61
PE Ratio9.3556.13
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.73B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.34B$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$321.75M$10.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GL and COST is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GL vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GL achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 40.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GL has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.35%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.31%
16.41%
GL
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GL vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Globe Life Inc. (GL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GL, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GL, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GL, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GL, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GL, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.30
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 5.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 15.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.31

GL vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GL and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.11
3.11
GL
COST

Dividends

GL vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

GL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than COST's 2.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GL
Globe Life Inc.
0.87%0.73%0.68%0.83%0.78%0.65%0.85%0.65%0.75%0.71%0.94%1.06%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.11%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

GL vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GL drawdown since its inception was -75.34%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GL and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.47%
-2.11%
GL
COST

Volatility

GL vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Globe Life Inc. (GL) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.61%. This indicates that GL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.79%
4.61%
GL
COST

Financials

GL vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Globe Life Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items