GK vs. LVMUY
GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while LVMUY (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 18.34%/yr vs -13.41%/yr for LVMUY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GK vs. LVMUY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than LVMUY's -25.87% return.
GK
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVMUY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -25.87%
- 6M
- -24.47%
- 1Y
- 7.72%
- 3Y*
- -13.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.51%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
GK vs. LVMUY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 13.03% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
LVMUY LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -25.87% | 18.11% | -18.01% | 13.89% | -10.84% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GK and LVMUY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GK and LVMUY has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GK vs. LVMUY — Risk / Return Rank
GK
LVMUY
GK vs. LVMUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GK | LVMUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.07 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.25 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 0.48 | +6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GK vs. LVMUY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum LVMUY drawdown of -80.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and LVMUY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GK | LVMUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.72% | -80.82% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -31.47% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -46.56% | +22.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -41.10% | +37.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.77% | -20.63% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 16.00% | -11.96% |
Volatility
GK vs. LVMUY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is 8.10%, while LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that GK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVMUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GK | LVMUY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 11.79% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 24.17% | -9.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 33.18% | -14.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 32.73% | -8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 30.85% | -6.83% |
Dividends
GK vs. LVMUY - Dividend Comparison
GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than LVMUY's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVMUY LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.73% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 1.65% | 1.78% | 0.99% | 1.64% | 1.49% | 2.21% | 2.67% | 4.16% | 12.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GK and LVMUY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVMUY has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to GK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs LVMUY's -80.82%.
GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GK and LVMUY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer