PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GJGB.L vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GJGB.LGC=F
YTD Return18.61%26.62%
1Y Return34.10%34.23%
3Y Return (Ann)1.07%10.55%
5Y Return (Ann)5.30%10.77%
Sharpe Ratio0.882.27
Sortino Ratio1.392.90
Omega Ratio1.171.42
Calmar Ratio0.664.74
Martin Ratio3.8112.87
Ulcer Index8.27%2.49%
Daily Std Dev35.74%14.16%
Max Drawdown-49.12%-44.36%
Current Drawdown-24.84%-6.35%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GJGB.L and GC=F is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GJGB.L vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GJGB.L achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 26.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.14%
10.96%
GJGB.L
GC=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GJGB.L vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (GJGB.L) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJGB.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GJGB.L, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GJGB.L, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GJGB.L, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GJGB.L, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GJGB.L, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.18
GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 4.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 12.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.87

GJGB.L vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJGB.L and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.76
2.27
GJGB.L
GC=F

Drawdowns

GJGB.L vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJGB.L drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJGB.L and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.95%
-6.35%
GJGB.L
GC=F

Volatility

GJGB.L vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (GJGB.L) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 5.17%. This indicates that GJGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.85%
5.17%
GJGB.L
GC=F