PortfoliosLab logo
GIS vs. XLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and XLP is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

GIS vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

450.00%500.00%550.00%600.00%650.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
552.28%
463.87%
GIS
XLP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIS:

-0.81

XLP:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

GIS:

-1.03

XLP:

1.21

Omega Ratio

GIS:

0.88

XLP:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

GIS:

-0.53

XLP:

1.27

Martin Ratio

GIS:

-1.41

XLP:

3.43

Ulcer Index

GIS:

12.53%

XLP:

3.10%

Daily Std Dev

GIS:

21.71%

XLP:

13.23%

Max Drawdown

GIS:

-45.08%

XLP:

-35.89%

Current Drawdown

GIS:

-33.02%

XLP:

-2.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 3.56%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.03% annualized return.


GIS

YTD

-9.72%

1M

-1.40%

6M

-16.09%

1Y

-18.15%

5Y*

1.92%

10Y*

3.56%

XLP

YTD

3.65%

1M

3.01%

6M

0.44%

1Y

9.52%

5Y*

9.54%

10Y*

8.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. XLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLP is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLP is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLP is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLP is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLP is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLP is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIS vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
GIS: -0.81
XLP: 0.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GIS: -1.03
XLP: 1.21
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GIS: 0.88
XLP: 1.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
GIS: -0.53
XLP: 1.27
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at -1.41, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
GIS: -1.41
XLP: 3.43

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and XLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.81
0.81
GIS
XLP

Dividends

GIS vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than XLP's 2.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.26%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%
XLP
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.52%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%2.40%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and XLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-33.02%
-2.54%
GIS
XLP

Volatility

GIS vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) at 7.88%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.28%
7.88%
GIS
XLP