GIS vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIS or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and PG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GIS vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GIS:
0.13
PG:
1.32
GIS:
0.31
PG:
1.88
GIS:
1.04
PG:
1.26
GIS:
0.08
PG:
2.22
GIS:
0.38
PG:
7.48
GIS:
6.44%
PG:
2.63%
GIS:
18.54%
PG:
14.91%
GIS:
-45.08%
PG:
-54.23%
GIS:
-25.99%
PG:
-6.48%
Fundamentals
GIS:
$36.60B
PG:
$401.13B
GIS:
$4.20
PG:
$5.80
GIS:
15.70
PG:
29.37
GIS:
3.34
PG:
3.60
GIS:
$14.66B
PG:
$83.91B
GIS:
$5.01B
PG:
$43.14B
GIS:
$3.00B
PG:
$22.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 17.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 5.08%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.
GIS
1.19%
-0.30%
-3.45%
2.66%
7.04%
5.08%
PG
17.54%
-1.66%
1.07%
19.40%
8.70%
9.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than PG's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.74% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.64%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GIS vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities