GIS vs. PG
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, PG in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.44%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for PG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -12.69% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -2.44%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.76% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 14.45%
- 6M
- -12.21%
- YTD
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- -17.93%
- 3Y*
- -15.76%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- -2.44%
PG
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
GIS vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -12.69% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 7.27% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and PG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1983 | 0.41 |
The correlation between GIS and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$20.65B
PG:
$352.74B
GIS:
-$0.16
PG:
$5.24
GIS:
1.14
PG:
4.24
GIS:
2.82
PG:
6.78
GIS:
$18.42B
PG:
$86.72B
GIS:
$6.19B
PG:
$43.64B
GIS:
$300.90M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
PG
GIS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.09 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 0.16 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -54.25% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -15.52% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -21.15% | -32.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -23.77% | -35.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -23.77% | -35.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -12.20% | -38.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -12.17% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.69% | 8.82% | +8.87% |
Volatility
GIS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.49%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 7.49% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | 15.92% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 19.67% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.07% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 19.15% | +3.26% |
Dividends
GIS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than PG's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.30% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.81% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
GIS vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and PG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to PG (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer