GIS vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Performance
GIS vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIS vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -18.85% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 1.26% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Fundamentals
GIS:
$20.19B
PG:
$349.27B
GIS:
$4.07
PG:
$6.75
GIS:
9.15
PG:
21.34
GIS:
3.94
PG:
5.22
GIS:
1.10
PG:
4.12
GIS:
2.16
PG:
6.55
GIS:
$18.37B
PG:
$85.26B
GIS:
$4.70B
PG:
$43.21B
GIS:
$3.03B
PG:
$23.62B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -1.98%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -24.64%
- 1Y
- -34.57%
- 3Y*
- -21.17%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- -1.98%
PG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -11.88%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- -13.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
PG
GIS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | -0.70 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | -0.87 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.90 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.72 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.33 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.46 | -0.70 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.23 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.45 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.46 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and PG is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GIS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PG's 2.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.53% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.93% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -55.55%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and PG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.55% | -54.25% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.97% | -18.31% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -23.77% | -31.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | -23.77% | -31.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.09% | -17.11% | -36.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -12.15% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.79% | 9.89% | +8.90% |
Volatility
GIS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.44%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 5.44% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 13.45% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.76% | 18.81% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 17.45% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 18.84% | +3.13% |
Financials
GIS vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 11.37B and revenue of 22.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 5.37B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 4.33B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.